>So here's the question for everyone:
>
>Do you guys think a good GM can maintain a good campaign with characters
>that vary widely in levels of power if the rules of the game allow for
>substantial contribution by the characters that are weaker in combat than
>the others?

Without having first hand experience in the RP you are playing, I would
logically think it would have more to do with the willingness and will of
the player who is weaker to contribute than the rules set down by the GM.
This depends on what your definition of weaker in combat means. A character
may be weaker physically, but smarter in tactics. A character could be
stronger physically and not as wise in tactics. I strongly believe it
depends on the contribution of the individual. Just because the rules allow
for contribution, which they should, doesn't mean the weaker player will
take advantage of it. Rules are the ground work for advancement but not an
automatic power-up, so to speak.


MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx