AR Logo

Index Thread Archive May-2003 Archive
 Main Index   Previous in ThreadNext in Thread   Previous in ArchiveNext in Archive   Index by Subject for May-2003Index by Author for May-2003Index by Date for May-2003   Index by Subject for ArchiveIndex by Author for ArchiveIndex by Date for Archive 
Subject: The Matrix
Author: Xavier <Xavier--rocketmail.com>
Date: 16-May-2003 19:43:04

Very well said!
I thought that perhaps they were still in the Matrix
in the end, however, that had that one guy that Smith
'posessed' and left the Matrix, so who knows?

We shall find out soon enough!

--- ar--marktaw.mailshell.com wrote:
> SPOILERS
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I noticed that the Wachowski brothers slipped from
> Eastern to Western philosphy and brought the Matrix
> from 0 century Messianicism into some sort of
> post-Decartes existentialism. "What is the nature of
> choice?" and so on.
>
> I think the first half was a sort of "Episode II"
> where they felt they had to set up the second half
> by establishing what everyone had to lose. It sort
> of dragged aimlessly. Also, the audience is smarter
> than the main characters, so in addition to being
> clued in to things they don't know... actually, I
> don't think there's much we know that they don't
> know, so it's frustrating when they float around
> from plot point to plot point.
>
> The second half felt very rushed, and I expect there
> will be a director's cut that fixes the flow and
> explains a bit more. I think they shot a lot more
> footage than made it into the movie and had to cut
> quite a bit for time.
>
> The speech that the Architect gave was very "deep"
> but it happened all at once. You didn't have a
> chance to absorb it and you're still trying to
> remember what while he's speaking.
>
> A lot of the trailers "Give us Neo" and such seem to
> be from the 3rd movie.
>
> I think the Wachowski brothers planned some of the
> humorous moments, but we weren't expecting a movie
> with humor.
>
> The Smith fight scene... did you notice that there
> were practically no cuts? I did notice some of the
> Smiths were stunt doubles.
>
> Ultimately, I think it's very re-watchable, but not
> as much of a package as the first movie. I expect I
> won't get some of the symbolism until I've had a
> chance to re-watch it a few times, but a lot of it
> was repeated from the first movie (a lot of Room
> 101's). It's more straightfoward than the first
> movie. The first time I saw The Matrix I didn't
> really get the plot. I had to re-watch it once or
> twice before all the pieces came together... This
> one came together very quickly. Some things were too
> blatent, and I think some of the plot contrivances
> too obvious.
>
> And finally... Are they still in the Matrix at the
> end? Why can NEO sence the sentinals?
>
>

> The FREE service that prevents junk email
> http://www.mailshell.com
>
>
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> The Alternate Reality Mailing List Archive
> http://www.alternaterealityarchive.com/
> To post, click reply or send to
> <Address Masked>
> To unsubscribe, send message to
> ************
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>


Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com



This Thread
  Date   Author  
16-May-2003 Dan Pinal
16-May-2003 Xavier
16-May-2003 Mark
* 16-May-2003 Xavier
16-May-2003 Mark
16-May-2003 Kyle West
16-May-2003 Nick
16-May-2003 Xavier
16-May-2003 Nick
16-May-2003 Xavier
16-May-2003 Kyle West
16-May-2003 Mark
This Author (May-2003)
  Subject   Date  
Chat 17-May-2003
ICQ 18-May-2003
Redesigned Page 25-May-2003
The Matrix 16-May-2003
* The Matrix 16-May-2003
The Matrix 16-May-2003
The Matrix 16-May-2003