Ahh no you misunderstand :)

Firstly I was referring to Dark Age of Camalot (DAoC)
Secodnly by hack fest I meant Hack as in Hackers , not hack n slash.

Dark age of Camelot had too many players using radar and speed hacks.
Made it most unplayable.

I find the xp however to be a lot easier for WoW than in DAoC. In WoW it
takes me on average 12 hours to get from one high level to the next ie
57 to 58 took me twelve hours.

In DAoC it took me a month to get from lvl 39 to 40. And when you died
in daoc you LOST soooo much XP you could cry.



-----Original Message-----
From: Xavier [Xavier--rocketmail.com]
Sent: 31 March 2005 14:29
Subject: RE: current online rpgs

Hack fest? I'd rather have the choice to quest or hack
my way to level then be forced to quest only. You
barely get any XP from killing mobs in WoW.

--- Slaine <slaine--ntlworld.com> wrote:

> Crushridge, level 58 dorf hunter (marksman)
>
> Did someone say Dark ages (as in Daoc? I would slit
> my wrists before
> returning to that hack fest)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: agora--algonet.se [agora--algonet.se]
> Sent: 30 March 2005 21:09
> > Subject: RE: current online rpgs
>
> In which server do you play? My shaman 52 is still
> "the" original char,
> I play in
> Mithaniel Marr.
> Ana
>
> On 30 Mar 2005 at 11:40, Frank Vicari wrote:
>
> I think its better.
> Its definately more quest oriented. You can just sit
> around and grind
> exp on mobs all day if you want, but you get better
> rewards and
> experience from completing quests (including
> "heritage" items like
> Dwarven Work Boots, J-boots, or Ghoulbane).
> I haven't done much raiding yet, so I can't really
> comment on that.
> I did try WoW (during the beta) and I personally
> wasn't impressed,
> tho I'll be the first to admit I'm probably pretty
> biased since I've
> played EQ1 since its beta and my original character
> is still around.
>
> Frank
> -----Original Message-----
> From: agora--algonet.se [agora--algonet.se]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:37 AM
> To: Frank Vicari;
>
alternatereality-From-agora-algonet.se--alternaterealityarchive.com
>
> Subject: RE: current online rpgs
>
> I have played EQ since many years but never worried
> about char
> advance and
> whatever. I have a shaman level 52 but I start to
> find the game
> pretty monotonous.
> How it's EQ2? Is it better? Can you compare it?
> Gameplay,
> atmosphere, char
> advancement, social play, guilds, online events,
> etc.
> I am thinking to migrate from EQ to EQ2, but I must
> know if its
> worth.
> Ana
> On 30 Mar 2005 at 11:24, Frank Vicari wrote:
>
>
>
> I currently play EQ2 (ok...no comments from the
> peanut gallery =) ).
> Personally I enjoy the game...then again I'm the
> guild leader of a
> pretty large guild. We're not raiding or anything
> yet, just exploring
> and finishing quests.
> Yes, there is armour and weapon breakage, but you
> only lose
> durability if you die and you can repair it back to
> new at a small
> cost. Its more of a money sink, but one that can be
> avoided with
> smart play.
> Any other questions about EQ2 I can answer......
> F
>